UgandaRef. #26Etat·A · Ecosystems & coastal protection·Environnement et ressources naturelles
Strengthening the vital ecological corridor of the Katonga-Kafu Basin wetland ecosystem
123.0 M$indicative cost
Large ticket
Location
Country profileCountry
Ouganda
UG · 1.4°, 32.3°

Expected impacts
- 1.atténuation (réduction et séquestration des émissions)
- 2.adaptation (résilience, gestion durable des ressources naturelles
- 3.préservation des écosystèmes et de la biodiversité)
- 4.Emploi
- 5.Inclusion sociale
- 6.égalité des sexes
- 7.Sécurité alimentaire et amélioration des moyens de subsistance
Impact themes
BiodiversityCarbonClimate adaptationFood securityJobsWomen
FRC Insight Corner
Public research dossier
Prepared by the FRC research team from publicly available information, multilateral databases, official government sources, and NGO reports.
Loading dossier…
Engagement scenarios
Play with the assumptions
Move the toggles to explore how different financing modes, private-sector participation and co-financing reshape the AfDB ticket and overall leverage.
Engagement mode
Public anchor + private co-invest
Private-sector share
40%
Co-financing (other donors)
30% of public
Project scale
100% of baseline
Disbursement horizon
7 yrs
Total mobilised
123.0 M$
AfDB ticket
51.7 M$
Private capital
49.2 M$
Co-financiers
22.1 M$
Annual AfDB outlay
7.38 M$
Leverage on AfDB $
2.38×
Public share
60%
Baseline cost
123.0 M$
Indicative · assumes a linear blend; actual structuring depends on due diligence.
Working notes
Analyst notes
Leave a signed comment on this project — observations, questions, intel. Visible to all visitors.
Loading notes…
Sources & methodology
What this page is built on
- 01F2BC — Programme prioritaire (CICOS / CEEAC)Official project pipeline brief shared by the Commission Internationale du Bassin Congo-Oubangui-Sangha.
- 02FRC analytical desk — internal compilationCross-checked against multilateral databases and national plans.
- 03FAO AQUASTAT, AfDB project portal, World Bank Projects DBBackground indicators and comparable project benchmarks.